|
|
Economics, poverty and transparency: measuring equity in forest user groups
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2003 |
| Authors | Richards, M,; Maksha Maharjan,; Kanel, K, |
| Journal Title | Journal of Forest and Livelihood |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pagination | 91-104 |
| ISBN Number | 1684-0186 |
| Key Words | community forestry; community involvement; economic indicators; forest economics; forest ownership; forest products; forest; resources; forests; households; non-wood forest products; poverty; social forestry; social participation; socioeconomics |
| Abstract | This study aimed to develop an economic methodology, usable by Forest User Groups (FUGs), for increasing equity transparency in community forestry in Nepal. Difficulties in developing a truly participatory approach led to a switch from the use of small key informant groups to the use of a household survey. Although more replicable, cost-effective and reliable for economic data, this reduced FUG ownership and empowerment. A main indicator for inequity was labor collection time: the return per labor day rose with the wealth group, reflecting shorter distances to collect forest products and more on-farm tree resources among the wealthier households. It is suggested that a suitable equity indicator to act as a proxy for the more complex economic indicators, and which could be more easily collected in a participatory way, is the time needed (average hours per day) to collect a bundle of subsistence forest products per unit of household demand (a composite of livestock ownership and household size). A gender-based equity indicator would be the number of female hours per day. Livestock ownership and household size should be a sufficient proxy for use levels. |
| |
|
|
